subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Sat, Jul 04 2009 

Resources

print this story   Print this story
  Post to del.icio.us

Published February 11, 2007 11:35 am -

DuPont to appeal $14M jury award to Strong



LAUREL (AP) — The DuPont Co. has asked the Mississippi Supreme Court to throw out a $14 million jury verdict awarded to an oyster fisherman who claimed chemicals from a Gulf Coast plant caused his rare blood cancer.

The award to Glen Strong of Bay St. Louis in August 2005 came in the first of nearly 2,000 cases against the second largest titanium dioxide maker in the nation.

A Jones County jury also awarded Strong’s wife, Connie, $1.5 million for loss of “love and companionship.”

The jury failed to reach agreement on punitive damages.

In documents filed this week, DuPont claims it was unfairly prevented from calling experts to testify, such as doctors and scientists who the company has said would have shown the company’s plant in Delisle was not the cause of Strong’s cancer.

DuPont DeLisle is located about five miles from Strong’s home. The DeLisle plant makes titanium dioxide, a white pigment used in paint, plastics, toothpaste and other products.

Strong’s lawyers claimed dioxins — chemicals that that can be hazardous even in small amounts — entered Strong’s body through the air and by eating oysters harvested from St. Louis Bay. Strong told jurors he ate oysters about four times a week.

DuPont called no witnesses in its defense, relying on testimony of Strong’s doctor who said there was no way to determine the root of multiple myeloma, according to the court record.

Before the trial began, the Mississippi Supreme Court upheld sanctions issued by Circuit Judge Billy Joe Landrum excluding nine DuPont witnesses from testifying in the case. Landrum said DuPont lawyers “deliberately avoided” depositions of its witnesses by not giving Strong’s attorneys an opportunity to interview them before the trial.

In its appeal, DuPont questioned whether the lower court was fair in judging the company based on the plaintiff’s “reliance on junk science” and a “failure to offer competent proof” of an actual cause of Strong’s cancer or whether the illness was a direct result of exposure to DuPont dioxins.

Information from:

The Sun Herald

http://www.sunherald.com



print this story    email this story   




Zillow
monster
autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Premium Homes

Mobile Home for Sale
2005 Caviler Double-Wide 28x56, 3/2, separate bath & shower in master bath, large master bedroom. Large roll in closets...>MORE

Real Estate for Sale
Beautiful Move In Ready Brick Home 3BR/2BA
Sitting on Almost 1/2 Acre Handicap Accessible
Fresh Painted Throu
...>MORE

Real Estate by Owner
West Jones, 20 acres craftsman style 3 bedroom, 2 bath,
sunroom, porches, fireplace, 10” ceilings, wood floors, la
...>MORE

Apartments for Rent
Hilltop Apartments
Spacious 2 BD Townhouse near
downtown Laurel in quiet small community. $550 per month ...>MORE

Land for Sale
Land for Sale: 25.9 Acres; Dykes Road, West Jones School Disrtict, Beautiful homesites, paved road frontage, won't divid...>MORE

See all ads


 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index